Great expectations net members ge dating

Online dating has obviously been quite popular for some time now, but it appears that one company may have overstepped its legal bounds -- though, it's unclear why those legal bounds are there in the first place.The company, Great Expectations, apparently set expectations a little too high.Y., Inc., violated New York’s Dating Services Law, General Business Law Section 394(c), by charging two clients 00 and 90, respectively, pursuant to contracts which failed to promise to provide either client with a specified number of social referrals per month.In such situations, held the Court, New York’s Dating Services Law only permits the clients to be charged for ‘social referral services’.After he joined GREAT EXPECTATIONS, someone at the center recommended that he selectanother member, Cheryl.He reviewed Cheryl's profile and found that they had verysimilar interests, including sailing.Apparently, one woman paid

Online dating has obviously been quite popular for some time now, but it appears that one company may have overstepped its legal bounds -- though, it's unclear why those legal bounds are there in the first place.The company, Great Expectations, apparently set expectations a little too high.Y., Inc., violated New York’s Dating Services Law, General Business Law Section 394(c), by charging two clients $1000 and $3790, respectively, pursuant to contracts which failed to promise to provide either client with a specified number of social referrals per month.In such situations, held the Court, New York’s Dating Services Law only permits the clients to be charged $25 for ‘social referral services’.After he joined GREAT EXPECTATIONS, someone at the center recommended that he selectanother member, Cheryl.He reviewed Cheryl's profile and found that they had verysimilar interests, including sailing.Apparently, one woman paid $1,000 for a six month membership and met no one, while the other woman paid $3,790 for the (no, seriously) "Marriage Program." Ah, no wonder the expectations were set a bit high.

||

Online dating has obviously been quite popular for some time now, but it appears that one company may have overstepped its legal bounds -- though, it's unclear why those legal bounds are there in the first place.

The company, Great Expectations, apparently set expectations a little too high.

Y., Inc., violated New York’s Dating Services Law, General Business Law Section 394(c), by charging two clients $1000 and $3790, respectively, pursuant to contracts which failed to promise to provide either client with a specified number of social referrals per month.

,000 for a six month membership and met no one, while the other woman paid ,790 for the (no, seriously) "Marriage Program." Ah, no wonder the expectations were set a bit high.

When he hit histhirties, he felt ready to settle down and begin making more dreams come true.However, when they required my credit card number upfront I became alarmed.The employee Taylor has called my cell phone numerous times, at least 6 times, even after I told her I changed my mind and was not interested.The service, which started out nearly thirty years ago as one of those video dating services, has moved into the online world in a big way, and apparently thought that let it off the hook of the NY State "Dating Services Law." A judge thought otherwise and is forcing the company to refund the fees of two women, which could open up many, many more lawsuits.The company plans to appeal, but the really odd part of the story is just how much the service cost.

Great expectations net members ge dating